This again signifies her lack of belonging within the middle class. This choice she will gain separates her from what Aristotle considered inferior.
Russell uses Franks alcoholism to bring out the comedy in the first act of the play. In Act Two, Frank himself mocks her for her lack of known identity, What is it now then? This applies when Rata quits smoking, possibly to improve her health, whilst bettering her education.
Using a different viewpoint, I believe Rata completely goes against Aristotle theory of comedy being an imitation of inferior people.
Rata will never belong in either class, as she is too educated for her own class but her lack of an ascribed status creates a difference between her and the middle class. Franks alcoholism is humorous to the audience because of it being so unexpected due to his class and career.
The determination of Rata to progress beyond her own class now changes the mockery once used by the audience towards her character into awe and admiration.
However, in Act Two, after she has gained an insight into academic education through summer school, Rata takes up smoking again, but due to her rise in self-confidence and class, it now seems like a sophisticated element of middle class life. This indicates to me that she is not an inferior character in this play.
As Frank has a problem with alcoholism, he Sins the normal middle-class lecturer; he Is Instead used to expose the deterioration he sees within the education system of England at this time. This is also similar with the issue of Franks alcoholism, as this was more accepted then, now it is considered a social problem within society.
This shows us how serious her intent is on bettering her life and her determination for this and this makes us view her as being superior in terms of strength and determination. In fact I think the determination shown by Rata in the play, leads me to believe that she would be considered superior to a contemporary audience as she elevates herself not only above her own class but also above the middle class through her necessity to better herself.
Although the majority of the audience watching this play would have been middle class, they would admire Rata due to her level of determination to gain an education.
One of these issues is the controlling relationship between Rata and her husband, Denny. This means that an audience of that time would find this more socially acceptable, but looking at it from a current perspective, this would be considered wrong due to society being perceived as more equal now.
Her willpower to improve herself does not follow that of someone who would be classed as inferior.
This portrays his distaste for his career and this problem separates him from the rest of his social class, It therefore classes him as someone who Is Inferior.
This type of relationship was not uncommon in the role, especially in working class British society. How to Write a Summary of an Article? The characterization of Rata is not that of someone that is inferior, but is in fact someone who is elevated above the inferior but is not yet considered superior.
I think an audience at the time the play was written would have admired her need to take control of her own life, even though they would be largely middle class. In Act One, Frank recites famous classical authors before finding his alcohol, Where the hell.?
At the time of the play being written, Margaret Thatcher had Just come into power and she spoke of attaining more than you were expected to achieve.
Through analyzing Aristotle theory, I can deduct that the character of Rata is not inferior. Educated people of his social class were typically expected to visit the theatre and enjoy sports. This enhances her working class mind- set to the audience and gives them more of an analysis of the comedy within Rata, due to her Interpretations and how they differ from Frank.
This creates empathy from the audience as she has no real identity; she is inferior in both classes and will never be considered superior. As Frank is a middle class university lecturer, he should be considered a financially comfortable and sophisticated man due to his social class.Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UK Essays.
Published: Mon, 5 Dec ‘Educating Rita’ is a comedy. “The comedy in Educating Rita is created by the clash of cultures.” ‘Educating Rita’ is a play in which the two main characters, Rita and Frank, are brought together in the world of literature and learning to provide Rita with an education and also shows how a comedy can form a clash of cultures.
Free Essay: The Humour in Educating Rita ‘Educating Rita’ is a humorous play that was written by Willy Russell inbased on his own life.
It is set in. Educating Rita is a dramatic comedy play written by Willy Russell surrounding a twenty six year old working class woman Rita White, on a quest to achieve education, respect and a sense of “what it’s like to be free”, her dream is aided by her sarcastic, cynical middle class English tutor Frank.
Educating Rita: Society, Education and Self-Reflection Usa Padgate * Abstract Educating Rita is a play written by Willy Russell, an English playwright from Liverpool.
It was voted ‘Best Comedy of the Year’ when performed by the Royal Shakespeare Company in Open Document.
Below is an essay on "How Did Willy Russell Create Comedy in 'Educating Rita'" from Anti Essays, your source for research papers, essays.Download