The quote can be interpreted in a few ways. Traditional text-oriented schools, such as formalismoften think of reader-response criticism as an anarchic subjectivismallowing readers to interpret a text any way they want.
The similar features between New Criticism and Reader-Response are defined in a generalized sense compared to their differences. Reader-Response theorists helped dethrone New Criticism from its privileged position by, well, drawing attention to the reader.
Using New Criticism helps the reader understand a text by looking more into the material without thinking of what the author might have written it for.
When explaining food for example, one could say this dish has a lot of salt, or not enough flavoring, or you could say that this dish brings back memories of your childhood.
Reader-Response theorists like to ask questions like: This is because my favourite books to read are not complex works of literature, but are relatively short novels that I can easily relate to. Inhowever, having recorded responses from real readers, Holland found variations too great to fit this model in which responses are mostly alike but show minor individual variations.
Am I stupid or something? Also, because reader-response criticism stresses the activity of the reader, reader-response critics may share the concerns of feminist critics, and critics of Gender and Queer Theory and Post-Colonialism.
Hey, if a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound? There are several different strands of reader response, a European one, emphasizing a cultural horizon of expectations, pioneered by Hans-Robert Jauss and Wolfgang Iser, one involving interpretive communities as constructed by intellectual disciplines, associated with Stanley Fish, and a popular psychological approach emphasizing student reading practices.
New critics believe that the meaning is within the text waiting to be found.
I prefer to read using the Reader-Response theory. New Criticism, on the other hand, is a form of close reading which states that the text possesses a meaning within itself and that readers must study the text carefully to find that meaning.
Sincehowever, he has turned to real differences among real readers. Think of it this way. The poet, to a great degree, acts as a conduit for the tradition of New Criticism is based on the notion that a poem has an inherent organic unity and can be read independent of context, as in I.
Using Reader-Response also helps the reader understand a text by sharing their thoughts with others and creating different ideas for every read.
Why Should Readers Care? He has shown how readers put aside ordinary knowledge and values while they read, treating, for example, criminals as heroes.
This aroma does not bring to my attention if the food is well prepared or not, but it takes me back to my childhood memories where I can see my grandmother making me the same dish in Israel, where I am dated around my entire family.
In an appendix, "Literature in the Reader", Fish used "the" reader to examine responses to complex sentences sequentially, word-by-word. Both Iser and Jauss, and the Constance School they exemplify, return reader-response criticism to a study of the text by defining readers in terms of the text.
A judge using new criticism might mention things like the texture is not right, or that the intensity of the spicy flavor is not up to par. Related Articles Where do you stand?
Richard Gerrig in the U. Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. Types[ edit ] There are multiple approaches within the theoretical branch of reader-response criticism, yet all are unified in their belief that the meaning of a text is derived from the reader through the reading process.
A person may read something over and over again and interpret a different meaning every time. Reader-Response A piece of work can be evaluated in plenty of ways.Get an answer for 'How does New Criticism theory differ from that of Reader Response theory, and is emasculation a part of the Reader Response theory?' and find homework help for other questions.
EBSCOhost serves thousands of libraries with premium essays, articles and other content including Reader Response versus New Criticism: Effects on Orientations to Literary Reading. Get access to over 12 million other articles!
Free Essay: New Criticism vs. Reader-Response A piece of work can be evaluated in plenty of ways. Critique methods such as Reader-Response, Deconstructive. Reader-response criticism argues that literature should be viewed as a performing art in which each reader creates their own, possibly unique, text-related performance.
It stands in total opposition to the theories of formalism and the New Criticism, in which the reader's role in re-creating literary works is ignored.
New Criticism was all about focusing on the text itself: you weren't supposed to think about the context, or about the author—and certainly not about the reader.
Reader-Response theorists helped dethrone New Criticism from its privileged position by, well, drawing attention to the reader. New Criticism vs.
Reader-Response A piece of work can be evaluated in plenty of ways. Critique methods such as Reader-Response, Deconstructive Criticism.Download